Comments on: Gregg Braden Debunked

By: Cleo Berisford

Cleo Berisford — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:30:16 +0000

Accomplishment.

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:40:48 +0000

Your conjecture of orbital resonance between the earth and Mars is not based on any scientific evidence. It is an attempt to make the biblical year of 360 days, and the changing of several calendars, fit into a presupposed (christian) worldview. Gulliver’s travels does NOT give an accurate representation of the moons of Mars (good explanation here: http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=333) There is no evidence for your conjecture whatsoever and in fact no physical hypothesis that could explain overlapping orbits of the Earth and Mars, that would result in present day orbits. Pretty good work up to this point – but your predisposed world view gets in your way occasionally. (Sleep paralysis from demons… WTF??)

By: admin

admin — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:45:03 +0000

Thanks for the reply, I think I understand where the confusion is.
Its that because he mentions the solars system’s motion and the only known cycle that he can be referring to is the solar systems motion around the galactic center. There is no other “traveling” the solar system is doing. I suppose you could say the up and down motion as a sub-part of the same cycle, but even then that cycle is 30 million years and has nothing to do with it. So Braden is either talking about the 250 million year cycle or another cycle that no one else knows about and he fails to define.

By: Manu

Manu — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:54:05 +0000

regarding the photonbelt: he refers to the 26.000 year cycle of the solarsystem around alcyone, centre of the pleiades of which we are supposedly part of. Not around the galactic centre, which would take around 250 million years, as you also know. In the tsarion debunkumentary, you clearly know that the photonbelt (if it indeed exists) only regards our revolving around alcyone. I don’t understand why you now all of the sudden use the argument that Braden claims a 26.000 year revolution around the galaxy (which he doesn’t) to proove the impossibility of this entering. In my view, these are two different things. I don’t agree with everything you say, but in overall your work certainly is food for thought and even eyeopening for a 2012er like me (for over a decade now). Even wrote and published a book about the ‘upcomming world ascension’ some years ago. I still don’t know what to make of all this and it’s all very disoriëntating, but thanks. I guess.

By: skeptic

skeptic — Tue, 18 May 2010 16:32:20 +0000

it’s good research to debunk people on facts and analysis. but people with a perspective that says the bible is infallible or that interpreting Jesus a certain way is an insult are just as skewed and of worthless opinion as the people they are, in this case, opposite. both sides are equally diluted. you can’t prove any of it. it’s all surely interesting, but hogwash in the end. i get the idea from your videos that you’re close to what i would call a fundamentalist. maybe you wouldn’t exactly label yourself that way but you are a follower of that religion/book, right? (Christian/Bible respectively). i think we need debunking everywhere. why not start with some of the stuff that the Church did and juxtapose that with some of the basic tenets of so called Christianity. you can’t just debunk those with differing or radically opposed opinions/beliefs and not apply the same method to yourself. you know? anyway, thanks for the research. i enjoyed watching.

By: Robert

Robert — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:31:24 +0000

Also, your video download link is broken.

By: Robert

Robert — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:30:40 +0000

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for taking the time to put this video together.

By: Gregg Braden Debunked | Illuminati Conspiracy Archive Blog

Gregg Braden Debunked | Illuminati Conspiracy Archive Blog — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:38:05 +0000

[...] 2012 Deception [...]